|
Switzerland
has said it would not intervene on behalf of Swis drugmaker,
Novartis, which suffered a setback on Tuesday with the
Madras High Court ruling against its petition challenging
an Indian patent law. (See: Chennai
court rejects Novartis patent challenge)
It
was in May 2006 that Novartis had challenged section
3 D of the Indian Patent Act, which bars patents for
minor modifications to old drug molecules. This practice
is popularly known as ''evergreening'', under which the
old anti-cancer drug ''imatinib mesylate'', which goes
by the Glivec brand, had been refused patent extension.
Novartis
sells Glivec at $2,500 per patient per month, whereas
generic versions of Glivec in India cost $175 per patient
per month.
Distancing
itself from supporting Novartis, the Swiss government''s
federal councillor in the department of economic affairs,
Doris Leithard, told reporters that it was normal to
have cases between private companies and governments.
"We
will not be involved in a private case and will not
go to the WTO over the issue. We have never done so
before," Leithard told reporters, adding that potential
Swiss investors would closely watch the developments
arising out of the Novartis case.
She
however, said, it was difficult to predict the impact
of the ruling on investment plans by Swiss firms in
India
India
and Switzerland today signed a MoU for closer cooperation
in fostering protection and promotion of Intellectual
Property Rights.
|