World
Bank to provide $348 mn for Tamil Nadu road project
New Delhi: India and the World Bank on Thursday
signed the legal agreement for the Bank-assisted Tamil
Nadu road sector project.
The
Bank has agreed to provide a $348-million loan for the
project.
The
total cost of the project is estimated at $450 million
with the state government contributing the balance $102
million.
The
loan has a variable spread over Libor and is a dollar-denominated
loan with a moratorium on principal payment for five years
and a maturity of 20 years.
The
project will be implemented over a period of five years
and is expected to be completed by September 30, 2008.
Back
to News Review index page
Supreme
Court comes down hard on securitisation law
New Delhi: Finding serious illegalities in the
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets
and Enforcement of Security Interests Act, the Supreme
Court today allowed Attorney-General Soli Sorabjee, financial
institutions and defaulting companies to come up with
suggestions to cure defects in the law. The hearing has
been adjourned till September 15.
The
Bench headed by Chief Justice V N Khare observed that
the law was now heavily in favour of lenders.
The
judges also observed that the law might require redrafting.
"Assets cannot be sold in a closed room," Khare
remarked.
The
areas on which there were fierce arguments in court included
takeover of borrowers' assets without adjudication of
claims, no reference to lenders' responsibility, absence
of procedures in the Act, the condition that 75 per cent
of the claim should be paid before the borrower can approach
the debt recovery tribunal and absence of any provision
for obtaining interim stay.
Kapil
Sibal, senior counsel representing Mardia Chemicals, against
which lenders have moved under the seizure law, resumed
arguments on behalf of the defaulters, stressing that
"no law in the civilised world allowed takeover of
assets of a company without the intervention of the court".
He
said that the Securitisation Act was passed in haste without
reference to the parliamentary standing committee and
an Ordinance was turned into the legislation, he said,
adding that the Act carried several unconstitutionalities.
Sorabjee
said the law was passed to meet an emergency situation
when non-performing assets (NPAs) accumulated in enormous
proportions.
At
one time, Sorabjee suggested that since the issues involved
were far-reaching, a Constitution Bench should hear the
nearly 100 petitions before the court. Most of them were
transferred to the Supreme Court from high courts.
Back
to News Review index page
|