Fonterra to pay French food group Danone €105 mn over false recall

02 Dec 2017

1

New Zealand-based dairy co-operative Fonterra will pay French food group Danone €105 million for recalling a product linked to a false botulism scare.

Fonterra said it would revise down its forecast earnings per share range for the 2017-18 financial year to 35c to 45c, down from 45c to 55c, as a result of the decision of a Singapore arbitration tribunal. 

The arbitration decision came after Fonterra issued a precautionary recall advice to some customers who had been supplied with its infected whey protein and products containing WPC80, which later turned out to be a false alarm.

New Zealand's Ministry for Primary Industries said that its tests showed the whey protein concentrate made by Fonterra contained a less harmful bacteria rather than the potentially fatal botulism and the warning was not necessary.

The warning made Danone recall its infant-milk products and sports drinks in nine countries, including China, denting sales and forcing it to lower its full-year targets.

Danone estimated in 2014 that the recall cost it €300 million ($360 million) in operating profit and €370 million in sales.

Danone filed a €630-million legal claim against Fonterra in the New Zealand High Court for breach of the Fair Trading Act 1986 and a separate arbitration in a Singapore tribunal.

The New Zealand High Court had temporarily halted the proceedings until the arbitration ruling, but Danone can now proceed with the case in New Zealand High Court.

Danone said in a statement that it "welcomes this arbitration decision as a guarantee that the lessons from the crisis will not be forgotten".

Both Fonterra and the New Zealand Government conducted extensive reviews into the events. A follow-up review by the Independent Inquiry commissioned by the Fonterra Board of Directors confirmed that the Co-operative's management acted in the best interests of its consumers and the Co-operative at all times.

''The decision to invoke a precautionary recall was based on technical information obtained from a third party, which later turned out to be incorrect,'' Fonterra said in a statement.

''While there was never any risk to the public, we have learned from this experience and as a result have made improvements to our escalation, product traceability and recall processes, and incident management systems.'' 

''We operate in a fast-changing and complex industry, and will always prioritise Food Safety and Quality in our commitment to be the world's most trusted source of dairy nutrition.''

Fonterra also said that it was reviewing the tribunal's findings closely, but admitted that there was likely to be limited options for challenging the decision of an international arbitration.

Business History Videos

History of hovercraft Part 3 | Industry study | Business History

History of hovercraft Part 3...

Today I shall talk a bit more about the military plans for ...

By Kiron Kasbekar | Presenter: Kiron Kasbekar

History of hovercraft Part 2 | Industry study | Business History

History of hovercraft Part 2...

In this episode of our history of hovercraft, we shall exam...

By Kiron Kasbekar | Presenter: Kiron Kasbekar

History of Hovercraft Part 1 | Industry study | Business History

History of Hovercraft Part 1...

If you’ve been a James Bond movie fan, you may recall seein...

By Kiron Kasbekar | Presenter: Kiron Kasbekar

History of Trams in India | Industry study | Business History

History of Trams in India | ...

The video I am presenting to you is based on a script writt...

By Aniket Gupta | Presenter: Sheetal Gaikwad

view more
View details about the software product Informachine News Trackers