TRAI squeezes big players, but customer is king
By Shashank Dev Sondhi | 13 Jan 2005
Mumbai:
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has announced
a reduction in the 'access deficit charge' (ADC) for STD
and ISD long distance calls, effectively cutting rates
by 62.5 per cent and 41 per cent respectively. However,
state owned BSNL, and companies that have invested heavily
in network infrastructure.
Every
phone call, both cell phones and landlines, uses three
networks. The network from which the call originates is
the caller network This call connects to the connector
network, which routes the call to the appropriate region,
and the receiving network.
The caller and receiving networks pays ADC as a charge
to the connector network in return for its routing services.
This is the reason rates double on long distance calls,
which is passed on to the customer. Many mobile phone
service providers have their own networks, two or all
three can be owned by a single company. That is how recent
entrants into the telecom like Reliance have by-passed
the ADC.
Though tele density in India has increased, the penetration
has been far from satisfactory. To this date, there are
rural areas where the concept of telephony is a myth or
a bada sheher (big town) facility, internet is
magic and the mouse is the magic wand.
Mobile phone service providers reap benefit of a large
tele density in urban areas, the responsibility for providing
rural telecom penetration ends up entirely with BSNL,
Reliance Infocomm, Tata Indicom and other companies that
have established their own networks of under-ground lines.
As
the core network provider in rural regions BSNL has to
bear the brunt of this decrease in the ADC. While increased
telephone usage would boost BSNL's revenue, now the more
calls channeled through it's network, and improved routing
services to facilitate it, will negatively impact revenues
from it's B2B services.
This would mean that the public sector giant would have
to reorganise its proposed fund allotments to cater to
the shortfall from target revenues. Though TRAI has said
that BSNL's revenues will be unaffected by the move, this
decrease in ADC puts a cog in it's revenue-generation
gears. Prima facie this measure seems to be too focused
on the users of private telecom services, and gives a
raw deal to the infrastructure provider.
The ADC had loopholes in it, and private service providers
like Reliance exploited it by routing international calls
as local ones. After BSNL took up the issue, Reliance
was penalised Rs188 crore. The private player's strategy
also helps it recover non-traffic sensitive costs can
be offset by traffic-sensitive charges.
The league of metro-centric private service providers will jump at the sop. However, the giants are sceptical about its feasibility. It is only service providers with their own networks that can be pressurised by the government to invest in increased rural reach. The customer benefits, and so do the middle-men, but the big players might have to pick up the tab.