Brainwaves synchronise to the speed of talking, influencing the way we hear words
07 Sep 2018
1
Have you ever found yourself finishing someone else's sentences, even though you don't really know them that well? Fortunately, the ability to predict what someone is going to say next isn't the preserve of turtle doves or those in long-term relationships. Our brain processes all kinds of information to estimate what's going to come next, and the speed at which the speaker is talking, or speech rate, plays an important role.
This study, published in the journal Current Biology, delved deeper to find out what happens on a neural level. "The findings show neural dynamics predict the timing of future speech items based on past speech rate, and this influences how ongoing words are heard," says Anne Kösem of the MPI and the Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, and first author of the research paper.
Speech rhythms and perception
"We asked native Dutch participants to listen to Dutch sentences that suddenly changed in speech rates: the beginning of the sentence was either compressed or expanded in duration, leading to a fast or a slow speech rate, while the final three words were consistently presented at the original recorded speech rate."
The final word of the sentence contained an ambiguous vowel, which could be interpreted, for example, as either a short "a" or a long "aa" vowel. Crucially, the speed of the beginning of the sentence could influence the way this ambiguous vowel is heard, leading to the perception of words with radically different meanings. For example, in Dutch, the ambiguous word is more likely to be perceived as a long "aa" word when someone was initially talking quickly (e.g. taak, word "task" in Dutch), and as a short "a" when someone was talking slowly (tak, "branch" in Dutch).
Participants reported how they perceived the last word of the sentence. The team recorded participants' brain activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) while they listened to the sentences, and investigated whether neural activity synchronised to the initial speech rate and whether that influenced how participants comprehended the last word.
The study showed that our brain keeps following past speech rhythms after a change in speech rate. If it synchronizes to the preceding slow speech rate we are more likely to hear the last ambiguous word with a short vowel, and if it synchronises to the preceding fast speech rate we are more likely to hear a long vowel word. "Our findings suggest that the neural tracking of speech dynamics is a predictive mechanism, which directly influences perception," adds Kösem.
"Imagine the brain acting like a bicycle wheel. The wheel turns at the speed imposed by pedalling, but it continues rolling for some time after pedalling has stopped because it is dependent on the past pedalling speed." This sustained synchronisation between brainwaves and speech rate helps us predict the length of future syllables, ultimately causally influencing the way we process and hear words.
Fundamental research with future potential
The team believes that, in the future, these findings may help researchers improve speech perception in adverse listening conditions and for the hearing impaired. Kösem added: "One follow-up study currently being performed tests if word perception can be modulated by directly modifying brain oscillatory activity with transcranial alternating current stimulation.
.webp)
.webp)
