SFIO files criminal conspiracy charges against IL&FS directors and two auditors
31 May 2019
1
The Serious Fraud and Investigation Office (SFIO) on Thursday filed charges against 30 individuals, including former directors and two auditors - BSR and Co and Deloitte Haskin and Sells – for lapses that led to the financial crisis at Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services (IL&FS).
In its first report in the IL&FS investigation, SFIO has levelled charges of cheating and alleged criminal conspiracy against senior management of the infrastructure financing group.
The IL&FS crisis started when in September 2018 the group of companies had defaulted on its debt obligations forcing the government to take over and replace its board with its own nominees.
SFIO has charged directors of IL&FS and ILFS Financial Services Ltd (IFIN), Hari Sankaran and Ramesh Bawa, for violations of Companies Act and under Indian Penal Code (IPC) for cheating and conspiracy. SFIO alleged that the directors were aware that the crisis was building and they did an 'alleged' cover up job. A lot of the borrowers of IFIN were not serving their debt obligations.
The top management was aware of the potential problematic accounts which were getting stressed in the succeeding month from the reports generated through the Management Information System (MIS) of IFIN, said SFIO in the chargesheet.
The directors did not declare this non-payment by borrowers as non-performing assets (NPA) and were lending money to borrowers of same group companies to pay the outstanding.
SFIO also charged audit firms BSR and Co and Deloitte Haskin and Sells with concealing of information by not raising red flags on the misstatements in the accounts.
The auditors colluded with the coterie to conceal material information and in fraudulently falsified the books of accounts and thereby financial statements from FY13-14 to FY17-18, SFIO said, adding that the auditors did not report correct state of affairs on net owned funds and CRAR.
The auditors in their defence had cited relying on Reserve Bank of India (RBI) inspection report. But SFIO dismissed the defence and cited that auditors did not follow the laid norms for auditing IFIN.
SFIO said that the auditors did not follow practices to bring out true and fair picture of the accounts and allegedly colluded with management to conceal alleged fraudulent practices.
.webp)
.webp)
